Submited on: 20 Apr 2012 01:51:59 PM GMT
Published on: 20 Apr 2012 05:38:59 PM GMT
 
The Germ-Soma Conflict Theory
Posted by Dr. William J Maloney on 01 Oct 2012 08:26:45 PM GMT

  • What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?

    The main purpose of this article is to propse an alternative theory concerning aging and death.


  • Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.

    yes


  • Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?

    yes


  • Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?

    yes


  • If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?

    yes


  • Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?

    yes


  • Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?

    no


  • Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?

    yes. It would be a great lecture at a university.


  • Other Comments:

    This is a very well constructed and thoroughly written article concerning aging and death.  This article examines various theories such as "The Law of Causality".  It states that aging and death can only be understood from a joint ecological and evolutionary perspective.  It also states that the germ-soma theory of aging/death has implications for concepts of evolutionary theory.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    clinical associate professor.

  • How to cite:  Maloney W J.The Germ-Soma Conflict Theory[Review of the article 'The Germ-soma Conflict Theory of Aging and Death: Obituary to the "Evolutionary Theories of Aging" ' by Heininger K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(10):WMCRW002266
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    It is a very big work - almost a book! - about a subject that is on the top of discussion in many academic institutes.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a former president and actual director of the Brazilian Association on Aging Studies -SOBRAE

  • How to cite:  Bedin V .The germ-soma conflict theory of aging and death: obituary to the ëvolutionary theories of aging[Review of the article 'The Germ-soma Conflict Theory of Aging and Death: Obituary to the "Evolutionary Theories of Aging" ' by Heininger K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001728
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a titanic paper (4126 references!) that deserves respect, in particular for the openness in opposing ideas wrongly considered as consolidated and unquestionable only because commonly accepted.

    The main (correct) thesis is that the scientific community shows about aging a form of schizophrenia and that the only possible remedy is a Kuhnian paradigm shift (s. also Milewski 2010).

    For the sake of brevity, I will not go to appreciate the many points of merit of the work.

    I think it is more useful to highlight some weaknesses, and this not to diminish its importance but in order that the A. may further improve his work.

    Therefore, the following observations should be taken as constructive contributions.

     

    (1) The A. rightly points out that aging is a phenomenon phylogenetically conserved and so having a function. I would add that such a phenomenon must also have a plausible phylogeny: about this I would suggest the evaluation of a recent work (Libertini, Phylogeny of Age-Related Fitness Decline in the Wild and Related Phenomena, WebMedCentral, 2011, Aging 2(11):WMC002530), which is an attempt to define the phylogeny of aging and related phenomena.

     

    (2) The A. knows well the term phenoptosis proposed by Skulachev. I think that he could highlight the great importance of defining as a unitary category a vast mass of different phenomena having in common the sacrifice of the individual (or of a close relative) as a result of supra-individual selective pressures. Aging in mammals, defined by Skulachev "slow phenoptosis", is only one class of phenomena in the context of a much broader category. However, while other phenoptotic phenomena are in general easily and universally explained as adaptive, on the contrary for “slow phenoptosis” there is the widespread wrong prejudice that it is non-adaptive.

     

    (3) The A. rightly criticizes what he calls Evolutionary Theories of Aging (ETA), namely Mutation Accumulation Th., Disposable Soma Th. and Antagonistic Pleiotropy Th.

    However, he should clearly distinguish between non-adaptive-ETA, such as those mentioned above, and adaptive-ETA. This is not a verbal quibble but a clear distinction between two groups of theories that are totally different.

     

    For non-adaptive-ETA:

    - a) The so-called species with negligible senescence are NOT predicted and are considered as exceptions  without a general explanation;

    - b) In the comparison between different species, it is predicted a DIRECT correlation between extrinsic mortality and intrinsic mortality (mortality caused or favored by aging);

    - c) In the case of scarce resources, it is predicted that aging must be accelerated.

    - d) Mechanisms determined and modulated by genes causing specifically a progressive age-related decline of functions (i.e. aging), without other useful functions, are NOT expected and are considered impossible.

     

    On the contrary, for adaptive-ETA:

    - a) The so-called species with negligible senescence are predicted as the default condition in the absence of selective pressures that favor aging.

    - b) In the comparison between different species, it is predicted an INVERSE correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic mortality.

    - c) In the case of scarce resources, it is NOT predicted that aging must be accelerated.

    - d) Mechanisms determined and modulated by genes causing specifically a progressive age-related decline of functions (i.e. aging), without other useful functions, are expected and are considered essential for aging.

     

    Empirical data show (s. in particular: Libertini, 2006):

    - a) Species with negligible senescence exist:

    - b) Ricklefs (1998) has documented an INVERSE relation between extrinsic and intrinsic mortality;

    - c) Caloric restriction increases longevity (s. Mitteldorf 2001);

    - d) Telomere-telomerase system gradually reduces cell turnover, causing a gradual decline of functions, i.e. aging (s. in particolare Fossel, 2004, Cells, Aging, and Human Disease, and Libertini, 2009, The Role of Telomere-Telomerase System Decline in Age-Related Fitness, available from my personal page: www.r-site.org/ageing.)

    These facts thus openly disavow the non-adaptive-ETA and appear to confirm the adaptive-ETA.

     

    (4) It is true that many theories have been proposed to explain aging. However, if the right criterion in science is that consistency between the predictions of a theory and empirical evidence is indispensable, the A. should point out that theories falsified by evidence must be considered as false and no longer acceptable and should indicate which theories are clearly contradicted by empirical facts.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Libertini G. (1983) [Evolutionary Arguments] [Book in Italian]. Società Editrice Napoletana, Naples (Italy) (English edition: 2011, Evolutionary Arguments on Aging, Disease, and Other Topics, Azinet Press, Crownsville MD (USA) Libertini G. (1988) An Adaptive Theory of the Increasing Mortality with Increasing Chronological Age in Populations in the Wild. J. Theor. Biol. 132, 145-62. Libertini G. (2006) Evolutionary explanations of the “actuarial senescence in the wild” and of the “state of senility”. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 6, 1086-108 DOI 10.1100/tsw.2006.209. Libertini G. (2008) Empirical evidence for various evolutionary hypotheses on species demonstrating increasing mortality with increasing chronological age in the wild. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 8, 182-93 DOI 10.1100/tsw.2008.36. Libertini G. (2009) The Role of Telomere-Telomerase System Decline in Age-Related Fitness, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York. Libertini G. (2011) Phylogeny of Age-Related Fitness Decline in the Wild and Related Phenomena, WebMedCentral, 2011, Aging 2(11):WMC002530.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    See below

  • How to cite:  Libertini G .A titanic work with some possible improvements[Review of the article 'The Germ-soma Conflict Theory of Aging and Death: Obituary to the "Evolutionary Theories of Aging" ' by Heininger K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001715
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse