Case Report
 

By Dr. Veena K Karanth , Dr. L Ramachandra
Corresponding Author Dr. Veena K Karanth
Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, 308, Malavika Residency, 2nd Main Laxmindranagar Kunjibettu - India 576102
Submitting Author Dr. Veena K Karanth
Other Authors Dr. L Ramachandra
Department of Surgery, Kasturba Medical College & Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, India, - India

TRAUMA

Trauma, Urinary Bladder

Karanth VK, Ramachandra L. Pseudo Acute Renal Failure due to delayed presentation of intra-peritoneal bladder injury following blunt abdominal trauma. WebmedCentral TRAUMA 2013;4(5):WMC004251
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2013.004251

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 16 May 2013 04:07:30 AM GMT
Published on: 16 May 2013 05:50:48 AM GMT

Abstract


Full urinary bladder is prone to intra-peritoneal rupture following blunt abdominal trauma. It is usually diagnosed early due to frank hematuria. Review of literature has revealed few cases of delayed presentation of bladder injury presenting as acute pseudo renal failure. Each of the cases has a pointer towards inherent bladder injury by way of a single episode of hematuria or development of anuria. We present here a case of intra-peritoneal bladder rupture following blunt abdominal injury presenting after four days of injury with abdominal pain without hematuria or anuria. Blood investigations were as in acute renal failure. Only one such case has been reported in literature.

Introduction


Full urinary bladder is prone to intra-peritoneal rupture following blunt abdominal trauma (1). It is usually diagnosed early due to frank hematuria. Review of literature has revealed few cases of delayed presentation of bladder injury presenting as acute pseudo renal failure (2-6). Each of the cases has a pointer towards inherent bladder injury by way of a single episode of hematuria or development of anuria. Only case, presenting as pseudo acute renal failure without hematuria and anuria has been reported in literature (7). We present here such a case of intra-peritoneal bladder rupture following blunt abdominal injury presenting after four days of injury with abdominal pain without hematuria or anuria.

Case Report


A 48 years old man with history of road traffic accident four days back presented with complaints of generalised pain abdomen since three days increasing in severity since the previous day. He also complained of minimal generalised distension of abdomen. The patient was taking normal feeds orally and was passing adequate urine, stools and flatus. There was no history of hematuria, vomiting, fever, swelling of feet or oedema of face. There were no co morbidities.

He sought medical treatment for his increasing abdominal pain at a local hospital. Serum creatinine was 9.4 mg/dL. Abdominal ultrasonography showed minimal ascites. There was no solid organ injury. He was catheterized at the local hospital and referred to Kasturba Hospital, Manipal for further management.

On admission, his general clinical examination was unremarkable. On abdominal examination, there was a small abrasion over left iliac fossa, mild distension, minimal generalised tenderness and guarding. There was no renal angle fullness or tenderness. Foley’s catheter was in situ and drained clear urine. External genitalia, perineum and per-rectal examination were normal.

Blood investigations revealed severely deranged renal function tests simulating acute renal failure which was perplexing (Table 1). Chest and Abdominal X-Rays were normal. Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed a moderate ascites with internal echoes. There was no evidence of solid organ injury. In view of a history of road traffic accident, Computerized tomography scan was contemplated but deferred due to deranged renal function tests. Minimal straw coloured fluid was aspirated on peritoneal tap. It was neither hemorrhagic nor bilious.

Emergency Diagnostic Laparoscopy was done. Foley’s catheter was seen freely in the general peritoneum (Figure 1). An H shaped rent in the dome of the intra peritoneal bladder was noticed. Edges were ragged (Figure 2). There was no fresh oozing of blood. There was extravasation of urine into the peritoneum which was drained. No other visceral injury was present. The bladder edges were freshened and sutured with vicryl continuously in layers (Figure 3). Within 12 hours, creatinine reduced to 2.4 mg/dL and returned to normal in three days. All other renal parameters were normal within three days.

Discussion


It is rare for a case of traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture to present as acute renal failure. Generally the presenting features after blunt injury abdomen causing bladder rupture are gross hematuria, severe abdominal pain or anuria. The diagnosis is evident and a cystogram can confirm the condition and the patient can be treated immediately. If the rent in the bladder persists, urine is absorbed from the peritoneal surface and though the patient has well functioning kidneys, presents with features of kidney failure. The urea, creatinine and potassium increase to alarming levels and sodium levels fall drastically.
 
On reviewing the literature, a case was reported by D.C.Jerwood (2), in which , there were two liters of hematuria on catheterisation. In another case reported by A Davenport (3), though the patient  presented with respiratory symptoms and abdominal pain, he was anuric until catheterisation which drained four litres of urine. D Brown (3) has reported a three year old girl who presented with abdominal distension and vomiting and a cystogram confirmed bladder rupture. S.KKilari (5), has presented a case of gross hematuria followed by five days of progressive abdominal distension and the anuria. Justin Stebbing (6) has presented a case which resolved by catheterisation alone as the rent was minute. Williams (7) has presented a case very similar to the present one, in which there was neither hematuria nor anuria only an initial abdominal discomfort following trauma with increasing abdominal pain and distension later on.

This case is presented from a different perspective. The patient failed to give a history of initial hematuria or anuria, the treatment focus was therefore entirely on establishing a cause for abdominal pain following blunt abdominal trauma and the acute renal failure which was diagnosed on investigation. Contrast imaging procedures were curtailed due to the renal impairement. The bladder rent was large and the catheterisation did not improve the situation substantially as the bladder and peritoneum were one contiuous cavity. The diagnostic laparoscopy was the turning point in this case. Sometimes, the patient can get admitted into medical wards for the acute renal failure and then the focus shifts to multiple hemoialysis without improvement of renal parameters but with increasing ascites. This creates a dilema which can be overcome by a surgical approach.

References


1. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery 9th Edition Chapter 40 Urology
2. Jerwood DC, Mason NP. Pseudo-renal failure after traumatic bladder rupture—the common features.Br J Uro 1995; 76: 406-407
3. Davenport A Goldsmith HJ. Ruptured bladder presenting as acute renal failure. Br J Hosp Med 1989; 41: 579-80
4. Brown D, H. L. Magill HL ,Black TL. Delayed presentation of traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture. Pediatr Radiol 1986; 16: 252-253
5. S. K. Kilari SK, Amancharla LY, Bodagala VLD, Mulakala AJ, Bushan JV, Vishnubhotla SK. Pseudo-renal failure due to intraperitoneal bladder rupture and silent subdural hematoma following a fall in an alcoholic. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39: 947–949
6. Stebbing  J, Ezra DG, Cackett PD, Greenstein AS. Ascites and apparent renal failure treated with a Foley Catheter. J Royal Soc Med 1999; 92:  582-583
7. Williams NS. Late presentation of intraperitoneal rupture of the urinary bladder.
Postgrad Med J 1976; 52: 246- 247

Source(s) of Funding


None

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Comments
1 comment posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)